A New Approach to Respiratory Monitoring in Preclinical Research without restraint or acclimation
In preclinical respiratory studies, traditional methods like plethysmography often require animal restraint and extensive acclimation, limiting their ability to capture dynamic respiratory changes.
To overcome these challenges, IPS Therapeutique Inc. validated a novel telemetry-based technique for continuous monitoring of intrapleural pressure and respiratory patterns in conscious, freely moving rats.
Study Overview
Using easyTEL+ M1 telemetry implants, they monitored respiratory function in rats under both baseline and challenge conditions. The pressure catheter was surgically implanted into the thoracic cavity, beneath the esophageal serosa, allowing for chronic, high-fidelity measurement of intrapleural pressure.
Figure 1: Pressure probe implantation
To validate the method, they compared telemetry data with plethysmography and exposed animals to respiratory challenges including:
LPS (lipopolysaccharide) to simulate inflammation
Capsaicin to activate sensory neurons
Hypoxia to mimic low-oxygen environments
Key Findings
Telemetry closely matched plethysmography in detecting changes in breathing rate, tidal volume, and inspiratory flow (figure 2).
Figure 2: Telemetry signal from intrapleural pressure (top) and whole-body plethysmography signal (bottom) from the same animal
Telemetry allowed to monitor the positive correlation between breathing rate vs. heart rate, and the negative correlation between intrapleural pressure and breathing rate (figure 3).
Figure 3: Relationship between Breathing Rate and Heart Rate (left) and between Pressure variation and Breathing Rate (right) Measurements from a dual-pressure or pressure + ECG probes.
LPS challenge led to significant increases in inspiratory velocity and tidal volume, that were revealed by both plethysmography and telemetry.
Capsaicin caused subtle changes, with longer inspiratory times during recovery, while hypoxia resulted in decreased breathing rate and inspiratory flow, clearly captured by telemetry.
Plethysmography detected brief respiratory pauses that telemetry did not.
Conclusion
While plethysmography detected brief respiratory pauses that telemetry did not, implanted telemetry mirrors the changes in pressure captured by whole-body plethysmography, and offers key advantages, such as no need for restraint or acclimation, real-time, longitudinal monitoring and simultaneous monitoring of heart rate, temperature, and activity.
Both methods proved complementary—each offering unique insights into respiratory physiology.
When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. Control your personal Cookie Services here.