A New Approach to Respiratory Monitoring in Preclinical Research without restraint or acclimation

In preclinical respiratory studies, traditional methods like plethysmography often require animal restraint and extensive acclimation, limiting their ability to capture dynamic respiratory changes.

To overcome these challenges, IPS Therapeutique Inc. validated a novel telemetry-based technique for continuous monitoring of intrapleural pressure and respiratory patterns in conscious, freely moving rats.

Study Overview

Using  easyTEL+ M1 telemetry implants, they monitored respiratory function in rats under both baseline and challenge conditions. The pressure catheter was surgically implanted into the thoracic cavity, beneath the esophageal serosa, allowing for chronic, high-fidelity measurement of intrapleural pressure.

Intrapleural pressure
Figure 1: Pressure probe implantation

To validate the method, they compared telemetry data with plethysmography and exposed animals to respiratory challenges including:

  • LPS (lipopolysaccharide) to simulate inflammation
  • Capsaicin to activate sensory neurons
  • Hypoxia to mimic low-oxygen environments
Key Findings
  • Telemetry closely matched plethysmography in detecting changes in breathing rate, tidal volume, and inspiratory flow (figure 2).
Fig 2a-Blog Intrapleural pressure
Fig 2b-Blog Intrapleural pressure
Figure 2: Telemetry signal from intrapleural pressure (top)
and whole-body plethysmography signal (bottom) from the same animal
  • Telemetry allowed to monitor the positive correlation between breathing rate vs. heart rate, and the negative correlation between intrapleural pressure and breathing rate (figure 3).
Fig 3-Blog Intrapleural pressure
Figure 3: Relationship between Breathing Rate and Heart Rate (left)
and between Pressure variation and Breathing Rate (right)
Measurements from a dual-pressure or pressure + ECG probes.
  • LPS challenge led to significant increases in inspiratory velocity and tidal volume, that were revealed by both plethysmography and telemetry.
  • Capsaicin caused subtle changes, with longer inspiratory times during recovery, while hypoxia resulted in decreased breathing rate and inspiratory flow, clearly captured by telemetry.
  • Plethysmography detected brief respiratory pauses that telemetry did not.
Conclusion

While plethysmography detected brief respiratory pauses that telemetry did not, implanted telemetry mirrors the changes in pressure captured by whole-body plethysmography, and offers key advantages, such as no need for restraint or acclimation, real-time, longitudinal monitoring and simultaneous monitoring of heart rate, temperature, and activity.

Both methods proved complementary—each offering unique insights into respiratory physiology.

August, 2025.

References

Related Products

By browsing this website, you accept the use of cookies for statistical purposes.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Privacy Settings

When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. Control your personal Cookie Services here.

These cookies are set through our site by our advertising partners.

Google Adwords
We use Adwords to track our Conversions through Google Clicks.

Hubspot
We use Hubspot to monitor our traffic and to help us AB test new features.

Google Tag Manager

Save